As environmental activists coalesce around a ban on the neonicotinoid insecticides as the cause of Colony Collapse Disorder (CCD), a timely article recently published in Forbes magazine by Jon Entine, a senior fellow at George Mason U., calls for cooler heads to prevail on the issue.

Entine points out that, over the past five years, some 30 percent of bees in the United States have disappeared — about 50 percent more than the rate expected.

The problem is more severe in some other countries. In Spain, recent data indicate a loss close to 80 percent of beehives. On the other hand, in Canada and Australia, there is no sign of CCD.

Scientists, including those at EPA, acknowledge that CCD is a complex phenomenon involving parasites, disease, nutrition, genetics, and other stressors. However, activists are advocating the neonicotinoids as the major culprit.

Over the past few months, CBS News, NPR and Dan Rather have run powerful segments and the popular media in general has cheered on a recent lawsuit spearheaded by the Center for Food Safety and other anti-chemical groups demanding that EPA ban the insecticide.

During a period of less than a month, The New York Times ran a front-page article and editorialized twice on the subject, dismissing what it called “manufacturers’ bland assurances” about its safety and all but calling for a ban. A similar hysteria resulted in the ban of alar on apples several years ago.

According to Entine, the research on bee colony deaths is uncertain — and often political. The science-based view of this issue took a sharp turn in January when the European Food Safety Authority issued three studies raising questions about the potential role of neonicotinoids in this latest wave of bee deaths.