Every year, whitefly peaks coincide with early tomato development, when the plants are most vulnerable to infection. Once a few susceptible plants are infected, tomato yellow leaf curl virus can fill an entire field with stunted plants that produce no tomatoes.

Even though growers spray insecticides, it takes one whitefly carrying the virus only a few minutes of feeding to infect a tomato plant.

Some growers have already planted resistant varieties, but often grow them alongside susceptible varieties. Srinivasan wanted to know if that was a wise practice, or if resistant varieties may in fact harbor the virus and increase the chances that whiteflies would pick up the virus and transmit it to the susceptible plants.

So in 2010, he used funding from a Southern IPM Center IPM Enhancement grant to study how whiteflies interact with both resistant and susceptible varieties, if resistant varieties could harbor the virus, and if whiteflies would transmit the virus from the resistant to the susceptible varieties.

Not only did the resistant varieties become infected, but whiteflies that fed on infected resistant varieties could acquire the virus and transmit it to a nearby susceptible variety.

Srinivasan concluded that growing the two varieties contiguous to each other may actually increase the chance of a yellow leaf curl virus epidemic.

In addition, because infected resistant cultivars show no symptoms, growers would not realize the field was infected until susceptible cultivars were infected. No variety has been developed that is resistant to whitefly feeding.

The initial findings from the Enhancement grant landed him and his Georgia colleagues a larger multi-year USDA Agriculture and Food Research Initiative (AFRI) grant, adding cooperators from South Carolina and Florida. With the AFRI grant, he hopes to find growers optimal solutions that will allow them to have marketable yields of tomatoes that will be desirable to consumers.

To find those answers, he and his colleagues are studying whiteflies more intensely, to understand what attracts them to plants and to discover other plants, such as weeds, that may be sources of whitefly populations and/or the virus.

They also plan to test several methods of whitefly control, including cultural practices like reflective mulch and periods of fallowness.

The researchers will also compare resistant and susceptible varieties for fruit quality, ripening and shelf life. Some of the newly-developed resistant varieties seem to be more promising in terms of marketable quality, so Srinivasan hopes growers may be more willing to grow them without adding susceptible varieties to the field.

Their analyses will ultimately result in a decision support website that will allow growers to plug in several variables to find out what varieties they should plant.

“For instance, they could choose an insecticide and a mulch and include their history of leaf curl virus, and see what options they have,” Srinivasan says. “The site would tell them how much risk they’ll have with the options they choose and how much they would gain or lose by planting one variety over another.”

In a given year, a grower could save thousands of dollars per acre by using a combination of cultural controls and resistant cultivars with significant reductions in pesticide use. Fewer pesticides would mean more whitefly natural enemies, leading to fewer whiteflies and a reduced possibility of infection.

For growers who have already lost a crop to yellow leaf curl virus, the website won’t come a moment too soon.

More from Southeast Farm Press

Unmanned aerial vehicles have bright future in precision farming

Photos: A day on the 2013 Georgia Peanut Tour

As grain prices fall, growers need to develop crop budgets for 2014

Pre-conditioned calves in high demand