More growth seen for U.S. vegetables The short-term outlook for U.S. vegetable production calls for continued growth in demand, with returns to growers dependent on weather conditions and foreign trade, says John J. VanSickle, director of the University of Florida International Agricultural Trade and Development Center.
Looking at current conditions, VanSickle says the U.S. fresh vegetable industry again struggled with low prices in 1999 and continued into the 2000 winter and spring markets, with prices in the first quarter of 2000 reaching their lowest levels since 1986.
Weather problems Poor weather conditions in California during the second quarter of 2000 helped prices to recover, registering their third highest on record in that period, he adds. Prices again declined in the late spring and summer seasons as normal summer supplies came to market.
"Despite cool and wet weather in California, a summer drought in the East and hurricanes in the South, total U.S. production of vegetables and melons increased seven percent in 1999," says VanSickle. "Combined with a five percent increase in the import of vegetables, there has been an abundance of fresh vegetables available for consumers."
Vegetable acreage, he says, is likely to decrease two to five percent in 2000 as a result of depressed returns to U.S. producers. Improvement in weather relative to 1999 and continued gains in productivity are likely to offset these declines, leaving expected production unchanged, he notes.
"Prices should recover in the fall market when California's production season ends, but prices will decline again in the winter and spring markets if normal weather patterns return," says VanSickle.
The import supply of fresh vegetables continued to grow, with imports being five percent higher in 1999 than in 1998, he says. Imports from Mexico declined four percent, but increases in supply from countries growing primarily greenhouse products offset the decline in Mexico.
"Imports from Canada increased 15 percent, giving Canada a 21 percent share of all U.S. imports. Since 1995, imports of fresh vegetables have risen 51 percent to $4 billion, representing 14 percent of all U.S. supplies," says VanSickle.
Mexico is the largest import supplier of vegetables to the United States with $1.31 billion in import value for 20 selected vegetables in 1999. Canada is the second largest supplier of fresh vegetables with $227 million in import value for selected vegetables in 1999.
"Growth in greenhouse supplies from Canada and European markets is expected to continue and will continue to pressure prices received by U.S. growers of field-grown vegetables."
Domestic demand for fresh and processed vegetables continues to grow as consumers respond to increases in income, product quality and perceived health benefits from vegetables, says VanSickle.
Per capita consumption of all fresh and processed vegetables - excluding potatoes, mushrooms and dry edible beans - increased from 268.2 pounds in 1991 to 295.3 pounds in 1999, a 10.1 percent increase. Per capita consumption of fresh and processed potatoes increased from 134.5 pounds in 1991 to 141.9 pounds in 1999, a 5.5 percent increase.
Better quality Technology-driven improvements in quality, says VanSickle, have played a significant role in these increases and will continue to produce better products that meet consumer needs.
U.S. growers of all vegetable products exported nearly eight percent of all of their supplies, says the economist. This compares with 19 percent of all fresh fruit - excluding bananas - and 10 percent of all fruits and nuts.
"Canada receives the bulk of these exports. While exports have been less important to U.S. vegetable growers than the impact of imports, the loss of this export market would have devastating consequences for U.S. growers.
"Canada will continue to be an important market for U.S. vegetable products, but increases in greenhouse supplies will have consequences not only because of increased imports from Canada into the United States, but also because of decreased demand for U.S. products in Canada as greenhouse supplies replace U.S. field-grown supplies."
The long-term outlook calls for continued growth in the demand for vegetable products, says VanSickle. And, he adds, the industry has been quick to respond to this increased demand.
"Grower incomes are and will continue to be driven by weather and foreign trade. Grower incomes improved in 1998 following the stabilization of the Mexican peso after the peso crisis of 1995 and the resolution of the trade dispute with Mexican tomato growers in 1996."
Most grower incomes have since declined for many vegetables and many challenges remain for U.S. growers, he says. "The largest growth area in the industry continues to be greenhouse vegetables. U.S. growers will need to continue investing in their operations to compete in these markets."
The vegetable market is dynamic and will continue to evolve, according to VanSickle. Opportunities exist for those growers who are positioned to exploit export markets, he says.
"Continued economic growth in global markets is critical to U.S. growers, not only for opportunities they afford our growers but also for the demand they provide for vegetable products worldwide. There will continue to be significant competition in the global market for vegetable products."
Growth in greenhouse supplies from Canadian and European markets is expected to continue, he says, and will continue to pressure prices received by U.S. growers of field-grown vegetables.