Cotton variety development a trade-off

Oct 2, 2002 12:00 PM, By Doreen Muzzi Farm Press Editorial Staff

Be careful what you wish for because you might just get it. That old adage rings true for many things, including cotton variety development.

Cotton breeders are able to breed improved fiber quality traits into new lines, but for the most part you trade yield for quality, says Bill Meredith, USDA cotton breeder with the Crop Genetics & Production Research Unit at Stoneville, Miss.

“Fiber quality is one of the easiest things to breed for, but we don't have a marketing system that encourages fiber quality,” he says. “There is a negative relationship between fiber quality and yield, and yield is the most rewarded trait in the cotton market.”

According to Meredith, who spoke at the recent meeting of Delta Council's Cotton Ginning and Quality Improvement Committee, for every hundredth of an inch in fiber length gained through breeding you lose about 12.1 pounds of yield per acre.

For example, on an average, if we increase length from 1.08 inches to 1.11 inches, we lose 36.3 pounds of lint per acre. “On average, if through breeding we increased strength by one HVI unit, we decrease lint yield 23 pounds per acre. That means if we increased strength from 27 to 29 grams per tex, we could expect to lose 46 pounds of lint per acre. If by breeding we reduced micronaire from 50 to 45, we would expect to lose 82.5 pounds of lint per acre,” he says. “These are the type of changes the textile industry wants made in U.S. cotton.”

These numbers illustrate the difficulty cotton breeders face working with more than one variety trait at the same time. “It's not worth it,” Meredith says. “We don't have a system that rewards high quality cotton, but without improved fiber traits we could ultimately lose markets. On the other hand, without high yield potential you may not even be in business next year.”

Meredith agrees there is room for improvement, with currently available cotton varieties in need of both a yield and quality boost. Backing up his belief are statistics showing that in 2001, 45 percent of cotton bales in Mississippi were discounted for micronaire, 20 percent were discounted for length, and 12 percent were discounted for fiber strength. The yield and quality traits exhibited by a cotton variety depend on genetics, the environment, and the interaction between the two.

Of these factors, the only one cotton breeders have the power to improve is the genetic component. “We have not improved yield one iota in the past 20 years. In fact, we're not even going in the right direction. We need a new cotton breeding strategy,” Meredith says.

In the past, he says, cotton breeding priorities were yield, earliness, pest resistance and fiber quality, in that order. Current breeding objectives focus on yield stability, fiber quality, pest resistance, added-value traits, and genetic management systems. The new world of transgenic breeding has, for the most part, focused on back-cross breeding methods using three genes.

While added-value has not added any yield or fiber quality in Meredith's view, he says it has simplified production management. “They are not without their problems, but their simplified management allows growers to farm a much greater acreage.”

Standing in the way of increased yield are problems with variety stability, emerging pest populations, changing management systems, and a narrow genetic base.

So why don't cotton breeders simply breed for improved fiber quality? In addition to its negative relationship with yield, current marketing systems are slow to encourage fiber quality, and there is no guarantee growers will be paid a premium for increased fiber quality. Can better cotton varieties be developed? The short answer, Meredith says, is yes. To do it, though, will take a new breeding strategy that promotes fiber quality and reinforces the entire cotton industry.

“If there is a dedicated effort to lower micronaire and hold yield levels it can be done, but it will take a concentrated effort,” he says.

Get Copyright ClearanceWant to use this article? Click here for options!
© 2009 Penton Media, Inc.


Latest Jobs

resources

events icon events

product info icon tradeshows

tradeshow icon digests

research icon photos

Continuing Education

Accredited in Florida, Georgia, New Mexico, Oklahoma, Texas, South Carolina and Tennessee:


(New Course)
Weed Resistance Management in Cotton

This course covers a wide range of options to effectively control weeds in cotton and reduce the risk of weed resistance management. It is accredited for hours/units for licensed/accredited applicators in 7 U.S. Cotton Belt states (Florida, Georgia, New Mexico, Oklahoma, Texas, South Carolina an d Tennessee. CCA credit is pending).

(New Course)
New Mode of Action Chemistry for Vegetable Production

Integration of a new mode of action compound like Coragen into IPM and IRM programs to control Lepidoptera in leafy greens, fruiting vegetables, peppers and brassica or cole crops is always welcome. This online CE accredited course details how best to use this new mode of action insecticide in intensive vegetable production. It is accredited by the Certified Crop Adviser (CCA) program and by state agencies for licensed applicators in Texas, Georgia, Florida, New Jersey and Pennsylvania.

(New Course)
Utilizing Calcium as Nutrient That Protects Against Disease Organisms

This online accredited course focuses on Calcium, an important plant nutrient in fertilizer management for maximum, healthy plant development as well as disease and pest prevention. It is accredited by the Certified Crop Adviser (CCA) program and for licensed applicators in licensed Georgia, Florida, Pennsylvania and New Jersey. Credit applications are pending in South Carolina, Tennessee, Virginia, West Virginia and Washington.

This course is accredited in Texas, Oklahoma, New Mexico, Virginia, West Virginia and Wyoming as well as for CCA credits:

(New Course)
Spray Drift Management

Keeping crop protection chemicals on the crop for which they are intended has been a cornerstone of farming not only to protect neighboring crops, but to not waste money allowing products to drift off the intended target. This accredited online continuing education course covers the critical elements of spray drift management.

Back to Top

Browse Print Issues

Additional Resources

subscribe to Farm Press Daily Delta Farm Press Southwest Farm Press Western Farm Press